Citation map · Study

Comparative evaluation of three situational judgment test response formats in terms of construct-related validity, subgroup differences, and susceptibility to response distortion.

16 references·5 citing·46 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It15,698 cited
1977Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.11,945 cited
1991THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS8,686 cited
1993Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.1,081 cited
1990An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation.534 cited
1997Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.411 cited
2001Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.407 cited
2006A Meta‐Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures402 cited
2003A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS347 cited
2001ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: A META‐ANALYSIS325 cited
2008THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RACIOETHNIC AND SEX SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN SELECTION288 cited
2007Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times287 cited
2008The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by