Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules.

3 references·16 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1972Group process and productivity2,103 cited
1971The American Jury551 cited
1956Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations321 cited

Cited by

2004PUBLIC DELIBERATION, DISCURSIVE PARTICIPATION, AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: A Review of the Empirical Literature1,427 cited
1992Group decision making and communication technology729 cited
2009Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning601 cited
1986Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks522 cited
2005The Robust Beauty of Majority Rules in Group Decisions.462 cited
1999Consensus Development Methods: A Review of Best Practice in Creating Clinical Guidelines451 cited
1987Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule.427 cited
2009THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE423 cited
1992Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups250 cited
1978Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior248 cited
1992Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950–1990

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

228 cited

1994Perceptions of Children's Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases1224 cited

2013Jury decision making: the state of the science216 cited

1990Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias.202 cited

1977Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.185 cited

1976Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.182 cited