APPLYING RANGE RESTRICTION CORRECTIONS USING PUBLISHED NORMS: THREE CASE STUDIES

Calvin C. Hoffman

26 citations0/0 files storedPersonnel Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Employer Branding and e-HRM Medical Education and Admissions

Abstract

This study evaluated the accuracy of range restriction corrections. Initial range restriction corrections used published norms as a proxy for unrestricted applicant data. The accuracy of the initial correction was evaluated using two large independent follow‐up samples (n= 983 and n= 1,389). The author found the initial norm‐based correction to be very consistent with empirical findings. The application of these findings to range restriction corrections with customized (i.e., non‐published) selection tests is also discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2017Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.1985Standards for educational and psychological testing 1972A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ).1980Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations.1973THE VALIDITY OF APTITUDE TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION 1951Personnel Selection: Test and Measurement Techniques 2018Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures 1985FORTY QUESTIONS ABOUT VALIDITY GENERALIZATION AND META‐ANALYSIS

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.