SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review (2007)Row-column (RC) association model applied…Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants (2006)Selecting scientific excellen…Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study (2006)Potential sources of bias in …Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications (2006)Gatekeepers of science—Effect…Analyzing the association between referees' recommendations and editors' decisions (2006)Analyzing the association bet…Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions (2005)Selection of research fellows…Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows. A Boolean Probit Analysis (2005)Criteria Used by a Peer Revie…Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications (2005)Committee peer review at an i…Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses (2002)Editorial Peer Review: Its St…Editorial peer review (2001)Editorial peer reviewEditorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)Editorial peer review : its s…Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? (1998)Peer review of grant applicat…Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees. (1995)Evaluation of cardiovascular …The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The reliability of peer revie…A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts (1990)A new approach to referees' a…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The state of h index research (2008)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship (1980)Real science what it is, and what it means (2000)Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes (2008)Universality of scholarly impact metrics (2013)Anatomy of funded research in science (2015)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. (1975)Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some Basic Issues (1976)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)The Review Process at PSPB: Correlates of Interreviewer Agreement and Manuscript Acceptance (1999)A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review (2012)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2002)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2005)Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility (2006)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Tacit Dimension (1997)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (2016)Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)FROM SCIENCE AS PROCESS † (1988)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences (2009)The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review (2018)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence (2017)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication (2008)Archives of scientific psychology: A new journal for a new era. (2013)How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector (2015)A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools (2012)Biological Importance and Statistical Significance (2013)The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
  • 2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
  • 2001Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses231 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1195 cited
  • 1998Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?146 cited
  • 2005Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions125 cited
  • 2006Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants120 cited
  • 2002Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses81 cited
  • 1990A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts67 cited
  • 2001Editorial peer review47 cited
  • 2006Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications44 cited
  • 2006Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study40 cited
  • 1995Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees.25 cited
  • 2005

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications
21 cited
  • 2005Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows. A Boolean Probit Analysis17 cited
  • 2006Analyzing the association between referees' recommendations and editors' decisions13 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.