SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures
15 references·16 citing·39 second hop
Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures (2013)Journal acceptance rates: A cross-discipl…Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)Distinction: A Social Critiqu…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)The Structure of Scientific R…The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)The weakening relationship be…Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns (2012)Flows of Research Manuscripts…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewA study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)A study of open access journa…Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis (2008)Conference proceedings as a s…Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems1 (2006)Research Standards for Promot…Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Benchmarking scientific outpu…Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Association of Journal Qualit…Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates (1988)Scholarly Consensus and Journ…Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1985)Distinction. A Social Critiqu…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1984)The Structure of Scientific R…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)The academic impact of Open S…Field, capital, and habitus: The impact of Pierre Bourdieu on bibliometrics (2023)Field, capital, and habitus: …And the credit goes to … - Ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists (2022)And the credit goes to … - Gh…Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications (2020)Rise in higher education rese…How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? (2020)How many manuscripts should I…Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model (2020)Does the use of open, non-ano…The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism (2019)The diverse niches of megajou…Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE (2019)Megajournal mismanagement: Ma…Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas (2019)Comparison of the share of do…Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey (2019)Acceptance rates of scholarly…Inexpensive Research in the Golden Open-Access Era (2018)Inexpensive Research in the G…Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities” (2017)Peer Review: From “Sacred Ide…Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference? (2016)Peer review in megajournals c…A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals (2016)A scientometric analysis of s…A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication (2016)A megajournal as a new type o…Emerging new methods of peer review in scholarly journals (2015)Emerging new methods of peer …Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. (2004)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. (2006)Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Characteristics of highly cited papers (2003)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects (2014)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Talking science: language, learning, and values (1991)What Is Agency? (1998)The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities (2002)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019 (2020)Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore (1992)Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy Formulation (1994)The Moral Significance of Class (2005)On financial contracting (1979)On strategic networks (1988)What is research collaboration? (1997)Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy (1986)Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination (1992)Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*20,290 cited
  • 2017The Structure of Scientific Revolutions5,397 cited
  • 1985Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste4,442 cited
  • 1984The Structure of Scientific Revolutions2,129 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases498 cited
  • 2012A study of open access journals using article processing charges358 cited
  • 2012The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age292 cited
  • 2002Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles284 cited
  • 1988Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates234 cited
  • 2006Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems1190 cited
  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
  • 2008Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis163 cited
  • 2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns
155 cited

Cited by

  • 2022And the credit goes to … - Ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists79 cited
  • 2019Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey67 cited
  • 2019Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas67 cited
  • 2016Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?56 cited
  • 2016A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals49 cited
  • 2017Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities”46 cited
  • 2020Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model43 cited
  • 2018Inexpensive Research in the Golden Open-Access Era38 cited
  • 2020How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?33 cited
  • 2023Field, capital, and habitus: The impact of Pierre Bourdieu on bibliometrics32 cited
  • 2020Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications32 cited
  • 2019Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE31 cited
  • 2019The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism29 cited
  • 2016A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication27 cited
  • 2025The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review26 cited
  • 2015Emerging new methods of peer review in scholarly journals24 cited