Measuring safety climate on offshore installations

Kathryn J. Mearns · Rhona H. Flin · Rachale Gordon

304 citations0/0 files storedWork & Stress

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Occupational Health and Safety Research Industrial and Mining Safety Occupational Health and Safety Management

Abstract

The human and organizational factors affecting safety were examined on 10 offshore installations using the Offshore Safety Questionnaire. The questionnaire contained scales measuring work pressure and work clarity, job communication, safety behaviour, risk perception, satisfaction with safety measures and safety attitudes. A total of 722 UK offshore workers (33% response rate) from a range of occupations completed and returned the questionnaire. The ‘safety climates’ on the various installations were characterized by most respondents feeling ‘safe’ with respect to a range of offshore hazards and expressing ‘satisfaction’ with safety measures. Respondents reported little risk-taking behaviour and felt positive about levels of work clarity and job communication. There was a wider diversity of opinions on the safety attitudes scale, indicating a lack of a positive, concerted ‘safety culture’ and more evidence for a range offragmented ‘safety subcultures’, which varied mainly as a function of seniority, occupation, age, shift worked and prior accident involvement. It is suggested that the interaction between these differing subcultures partly determines the prevailing ‘safety climate’ on any given installation. The UK oil and gas industry is now trying to improve its safety culture through the ‘Stepchange’ initiative, which hias set itself three main targets for the year 2000 : a 50 YO improvement in the industry's safety performance; safety performance contracts demonstrating leadership's personal concern for safety as an equal to business performance and encouraging industry members to work together to improve sharing of safety information and good practice. It is suggested that the existence of a strong, cohesive culture with respect to safety is not necessarily beneficial, possibly leading to ‘dry rot’ and complacency. A healthy culture may be represented by a range of assumptions, values, norms and expectations as reflected in employees' differing experiences of safety climate.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 304 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign 1977Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.1996What is the Difference between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars 1988Behavioral Norms and Expectations 1984Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line 1993The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster 1992The Cultural Approach to the Formation of Organizational Climate 1997The Psychology of Behaviour at Work: The Individual in the Organization

Cited by

2000Towards a model of safety culture 2006The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review.2003Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments 2004Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship 2012Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.