SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A call for systematic reviews
12 references·0 citing·41 second hop
A call for systematic reviews (2004)A call for systematic reviewsSystematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts (2003)Systematic reviews: a cross-s…A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)A Brief History of Research S…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…The Medical Review Article Revisited: Has the Science Improved? (1999)The Medical Review Article Re…QUALITY-ASSESSED REVIEWS OF HEALTH CARE INTERVENTIONS AND THE DATABASE OF ABSTRACTS OF REVIEWS OF EFFECTIVENESS (DARE) (1999)QUALITY-ASSESSED REVIEWS OF H…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' guides to the medical …Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)The Cochrane Collaboration: P…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)A comparison of results of me…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2003)The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health (2006)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions (2001)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques (1997)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 1993The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care562 cited
  • 2002A Brief History of Research Synthesis552 cited
  • 1994Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group486 cited
  • 1999The Medical Review Article Revisited: Has the Science Improved?152 cited
  • 2003Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts102 cited
  • 1999QUALITY-ASSESSED REVIEWS OF HEALTH CARE INTERVENTIONS AND THE DATABASE OF ABSTRACTS OF REVIEWS OF EFFECTIVENESS (DARE)40 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work