SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals
16 references·16 citing·35 second hopsampled
Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals (2010)Influence of trial registration on report…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement (2006)Reporting in randomized clini…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The quality of randomized tri…Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical Trial Registration: …Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)Bad reporting does not mean b…The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist (2002)The reporting of methodologic…Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Association of Journal Qualit…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies (2000)Assessing the potential for b…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias (2017)Clinical trial registration w…A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)A systematic review of the pr…Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning (2016)Prevention of selective outco…Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review (2015)Inadequate use and regulation…Endorsement of the CONSORT guidelines, trial registration, and the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials in leading nursing journals: A cross-sectional analysis (2014)Endorsement of the CONSORT gu…Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions (2013)Surgical trials and trial reg…Compliance to the CONSORT statement of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation: a 3-year overview (2013)Compliance to the CONSORT sta…A systematic review of the reporting of sample size calculations and corresponding data components in observational functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (2013)A systematic review of the re…Trial registration in Latin America and the Caribbean’s: study of randomized trials published in 2010 (2012)Trial registration in Latin A…The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement (2012)The quality of reporting of R…Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications (2012)Reporting of methods was bett…Can We Depend on Investigators to Identify and Register Randomized Controlled Trials? (2012)Can We Depend on Investigator…Trial Registration and Declaration of Registration by Authors of Randomized Controlled Trials (2011)Trial Registration and Declar…Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support (2011)Standards for reporting rando…Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials (2011)Do urology journals enforce t…A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals (2011)A systematic survey of the qu…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education (2014)Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: A systematic review (2014)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group313 cited
  • 2002Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles284 cited
  • 2004Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors264 cited
  • 2006Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

227 cited
  • 2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited
  • 2002The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist167 cited
  • 2000Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies123 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals56 cited
    • 2011Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support52 cited
    • 2017Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias49 cited
    • 2017A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results47 cited
    • 2015Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review46 cited
    • 2013Compliance to the CONSORT statement of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation: a 3-year overview40 cited
    • 2013A systematic review of the reporting of sample size calculations and corresponding data components in observational functional magnetic resonance imaging studies38 cited
    • 2014Endorsement of the CONSORT guidelines, trial registration, and the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials in leading nursing journals: A cross-sectional analysis34 cited
    • 2011Trial Registration and Declaration of Registration by Authors of Randomized Controlled Trials34 cited
    • 2011Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials32 cited
    • 2016Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning32 cited
    • 2012Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications30 cited
    • 2012Trial registration in Latin America and the Caribbean’s: study of randomized trials published in 201027 cited
    • 2012Can We Depend on Investigators to Identify and Register Randomized Controlled Trials?26 cited
    • 2013Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions24 cited
    • 2012The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement23 cited