SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Como avaliar criticamente revisões sistemáticas e metanálises?
15 references·5 citing·36 second hop
Como avaliar criticamente revisões sistemáticas e metanálises? (2007)Como avaliar criticamente revisões sistem…Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Assessment of methodological …Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)How important are comprehensi…The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews (2001)The art of quality assessment…An illustrated guide to the methods of meta‐analysis (2001)An illustrated guide to the m…Should journals publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research (2000)Should journals publish syste…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Assessing the quality of repo…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials (1993)Meta-analytic stimulus for ch…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…The Effect of Neurofeedback on the Reaction Time and Cognitive Performance of Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2022)The Effect of Neurofeedback o…Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre intervenções antibullying em escolas (2017)Revisão sistemática da litera…Desenvolvimento da linguagem e sua relação com comportamento social, ambientes familiar e escolar: revisão sistemática (2016)Desenvolvimento da linguagem …Qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileiros (2014)Qualidade metodológica das re…Interpretação Crítica dos Resultados Estatísticos de uma Meta‐Análise: Estratégias Metodológicas (2013)Interpretação Crítica dos Res…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009)Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (2004)A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables (2008)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited
  • 2001The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews245 cited
  • 2005Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study239 cited
  • 1993Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials117 cited
  • 2001An illustrated guide to the methods of meta‐analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

107 cited
  • 2000Should journals publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research75 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre intervenções antibullying em escolas68 cited
    • 2014Qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileiros55 cited
    • 2022The Effect of Neurofeedback on the Reaction Time and Cognitive Performance of Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis46 cited
    • 2016Desenvolvimento da linguagem e sua relação com comportamento social, ambientes familiar e escolar: revisão sistemática44 cited
    • 2013Interpretação Crítica dos Resultados Estatísticos de uma Meta‐Análise: Estratégias Metodológicas32 cited