SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited
0 references·7 citing·22 second hop
Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited (2008)Multiple imputation to correct for partia…Statistical methods for evaluating the fine needle aspiration cytology procedure in breast cancer diagnosis (2022)Statistical methods for evalu…Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard (2016)Partial verification bias and…Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies (2016)Anticipating missing referenc…Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex‐ante and ex‐post peer evaluation data from the A ustrian science fund (2014)Testing for the fairness and …Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy in the Face of Multiple Reference Standards (2013)Evaluating Diagnostic Accurac…Adjusting for Partial Verification or Workup Bias in Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2012)Adjusting for Partial Verific…Adjusting for Differential-verification Bias in Diagnostic-accuracy Studies (2011)Adjusting for Differential-ve…rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. (1993)Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. (2000)Bias in peer review (2012)External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures (2018)Configurational determinants of time-to-win in NSFC youth program funding: Insights from Chinese library and information science (2024)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods (2007)Challenges in diagnostic accuracy studies in primary care: the fecal calprotectin example (2013)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study (2015)A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2022)Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods (2023)A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013)Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results (1987)A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies50 cited
  • 2013Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy in the Face of Multiple Reference Standards43 cited
  • 2011Adjusting for Differential-verification Bias in Diagnostic-accuracy Studies34 cited
  • 2012Adjusting for Partial Verification or Workup Bias in Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies25 cited
  • 2016Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard23 cited
  • 2014Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex‐ante and ex‐post peer evaluation data from the A ustrian science fund21 cited
  • 2022Statistical methods for evaluating the fine needle aspiration cytology procedure in breast cancer diagnosis14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work