Achieving strategic renewal: the multi-level influences of top and middle managers’ boundary-spanning

Lotte Glaser · Sebastian P. L. Fourné · Tom Elfring

102 citations0/0 files storedSmall Business Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Innovation and Knowledge Management Management and Organizational Studies

Abstract

Drawing on corporate entrepreneurship (CE) and social network research, this study focuses on strategic renewal as a form of CE and examines the impact of boundary-spanning at top and middle management levels on business units’ exploratory innovation. Analyses of multi-source and multi-level data, collected from 72 top managers (TMs) and 397 middle managers (MMs) operating in 34 units of a multi-national organization, indicate that TMs’ boundary-spanning is positively related to units’ exploratory innovation, but also has a cascading effect on MMs by increasing their perceived role conflict. MMs’ role conflict is negatively related to units’ exploratory innovation and thus offsets some of the benefits gained through TMs’ boundary-spanning activities. Taking a configurational perspective on social exchanges at multiple levels, we show that role conflict is reduced by overlapping boundary-spanning ties among TMs and MMs. Surprisingly, MMs’ boundary-spanning does not relate to exploratory innovation. Our study shows that with regard to boundary-spanning, a top-down approach to CE as strategic renewal may be most effective because TMs play a key role in driving exploratory innovation. However, TMs need to be aware of the cascading social liabilities of their boundary-spanning behavior and ensure MMs develop similar networks. We advance ongoing debates in studies about CE and social networks by providing empirically validated insights into who drives strategic renewal and by uncovering the benefits and costs of social exchanges for strategic renewal. Furthermore, we uncover potential causes of mixed findings in network theory research and highlight a remedy to social liabilities.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 102 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1973The Strength of Weak Ties 1996Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm 1979The Social Psychology of Organizations.1986Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design 1997Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness 2001Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.1996Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm

Cited by

2019Product Innovation and Educational Diversity in Top and Middle Management Teams 2016Middle Managers and the Translation of New Ideas in Organizations: A Review of Micro‐practices and Contingencies 2020Management challenges for future digitalization of healthcare services 2019Structural and contextual approaches to ambidexterity: A meta-analysis of organizational and environmental contingencies 2016Transformational leadership, social capital and organizational innovation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.