TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF INTEGRITY TEST SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES: AN ITEM‐LEVEL ANALYSIS OF SEVEN TESTS

James Edward Wanek · Paul R. Sackett · Deniz S. Öneş

65 citations0/0 files storedPersonnel Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Personality Traits and Psychology Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

A judgmental sort of 798 items from 7 paper‐and‐pencil integrity tests produced 23 thematic composites. Patterns of correlations between these composites and the 7 integrity measures and 2 Big Five measures shed light on similarities and differences between different integrity tests. Principal components analysis of 23 composites indicated 4 principal components that further illuminate the content domain of integrity tests. The relationships between 4 integrity principal components and integrity test scores as well as measures of the Big Five dimensions of personality are reported. The findings suggest that integrity tests can differ in their emphasis on various thematic composites, and, yet, be very similar in terms of their standing on the 4 integrity principal components. Different integrity tests can be quite different in terms of surface content, and, yet, assess the same underlying constructs.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

1992The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.1997Handbook of personality psychology 1993Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.1982Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences.1996Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.1996Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.1965Theory of Psychological Measurement 1989INTEGRITY TESTING FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION: AN UPDATE

Cited by

2009Using Narrow Facets of an Integrity Test to Predict Safety: A test validation study 2014Individual Differences in Instructor Attitudes Underlying Maltreatment and Effective Mentoring in Basic Military Training 2009The Utility of Integrity Testing for Controlling Workers’ Compensation Costs

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.