SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Getting to the point: Attempting to improve juror comprehension of capital penalty phase instructions.
16 references·3 citing·36 second hop
Getting to the point: Attempting to improve juror comprehension of capital penalty phase instructions. (2010)Getting to the point: Attempting to impro…Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. (2009)Capital jury deliberation: Ef…Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. (2000)Discrimination and instructio…What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. (1997)What social science teaches u…Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. (1997)Does expert psychological tes…Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Comprehensibility of approved…Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions. (1994)Comprehending life and death …Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis. (1988)Expert psychological testimon…The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. (1986)The impact of general versus …Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Jurors Can Understand (1984)Toward Criminal Jury Instruct…Making jury instructions understandable (1983)Making jury instructions unde…Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Making Legal Language Underst…The American Jury (1971)The American JuryNatural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem (1971)Natural and contrived experie…The American Jury. (1967)The American Jury.Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Behavioral sciences and the l…North Carolina Law Review (1927)North Carolina Law ReviewThe disappearing trial: how social scientists can help save the jury from extinction (2021)The disappearing trial: how s…Re-evaluating how to measure jurors’ comprehension and application of jury instructions (2019)Re-evaluating how to measure …Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database. (2015)Life or death: An examination…The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism (1988)Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe (1995)Does Racism Harm Health? Did Child Abuse Exist Before 1962? On Explicit Questions, Critical Science, and Current Controversies: An Ecosocial Perspective (2003)Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty? (2003)The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? (2005)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. (2001)Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim (2008)Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim (2009)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech (1978)In defense of external invalidity. (1983)The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later. (2008)A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas (2013)Logics in Action (2013)Culturally Responsive School Leadership (2016)Language in the Legal Process (1980)Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. (1996)Linguistic Complexity in Firm Disclosures: Obfuscation or Information? (2014)Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. (1993)The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism (2000)Interventions to reduce stress in university students: A review and meta-analysis (2012)The group polarization phenomenon. (1976)Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. (1986)Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting (1998)How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality?1 (1975)Understanding instructions. (1996)Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition (2004)Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. (1973)Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2009)Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions (1982)Justice, liability, and blame: community views and the criminal law (1995)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1927North Carolina Law Review1,724 cited
  • 1966Behavioral sciences and the law.1,075 cited
  • 1971The American Jury551 cited
  • 1967The American Jury.467 cited
  • 1971Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem443 cited
  • 1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions376 cited
  • 1988Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.176 cited
  • 2000Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.136 cited
  • 1986The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment.131 cited
  • 1983Making jury instructions understandable125 cited
  • 1997Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis.114 cited
  • 1997What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process.108 cited
  • 1994Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions.95 cited
  • 2009Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.89 cited
  • 1984Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Jurors Can Understand

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

84 cited
  • 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database.20 cited
    • 2019Re-evaluating how to measure jurors’ comprehension and application of jury instructions17 cited
    • 2021The disappearing trial: how social scientists can help save the jury from extinction11 cited