Comments on “Re-Examination of the Fakability of the Gordon Personal Inventory and Profile: A Reply to Schwab”

Donald P. Schwab

2 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

This comment shows that Braun and Farrell's (1974) reply to Schwab (1970) was deficient because it inappropriately generalized from an independent samples design to a repeated-measures design. It further corrects several erroneous interpretations made by Braun and Farrell of the Schwab study. Finally, it suggests some new directions for test-faking research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research 1949An extension of control group design.1954Test-Retest Effect on Personality Questionnaires 1974Re-Examination of the Fakability of the Gordon Personal Inventory and Profile: A Reply to Schwab 1970Counterbalancing and Fakability of the Gordon Personal Inventory and Profile

Cited by

1999Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.