References

• 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
• 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
• 2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.862 cited
• 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
• 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
• 2008Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor558 cited
• 2009The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations456 cited
• 2002The counting house447 cited
• 2008The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Figure 1.407 cited
• 2008The state of h index research396 cited
• 2002Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles