SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation · Study

ReviewRules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation

David F. Ransohoff2004

Review2004

Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation

David F. Ransohoff

500 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature reviews. Cancer

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 500 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative

Cited by

2005Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research 2019Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 2005Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies 2011STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology – Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): An Extension of the STROBE Statement 2008QUADOMICS: An adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of ‘-omics’-based technologies 2009Overinterpretation of Clinical Applicability in Molecular Diagnostic Research 2005Molecular Bias 2007Molecular evidence‐based medicine

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2008A methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases and to assess diagnostic and screening test accuracy for patient populations: Application to the Papanicolaou cervical cancer smear testarticle · 4 shared references 2012The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimatesarticle · 4 shared references 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studiesarticle · 3 shared references 2005Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker researchreview · 3 shared references 2008How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Testarticle · 3 shared references 2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standardreview · 3 shared references

Details

Year2004

Typereview

Published2004-04-01

VenueNature reviews. Cancer

ISSN-L1474-175X

Languageen

Citations500

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1038/nrc1322

openalex_workW1575982426

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.