SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research · Study

ReviewBias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research

David F. Ransohoff2005

Review2005

Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research

David F. Ransohoff

487 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature reviews. Cancer

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 487 citations exist upstream.

References

2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration 1996The CONSORT Statement 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative 2004Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation

Cited by

2012Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration 2016Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility 2013Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions 2013ERROR ANALYSIS AND PROPAGATION IN METABOLOMICS DATA ANALYSIS 2010Methodological Deficits in Diagnostic Research Using ‘-Omics’ Technologies: Evaluation of the QUADOMICS Tool and Quality of Recently Published Studies 2006Evidence-Based Assessment and Application of Prognostic Markers: The Long Way from Single Studies to Meta-Analysis

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2004Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyondarticle · 4 shared references 2008Applying the CONSORT and STROBE Statements to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Studiesarticle · 4 shared references 2011Publication guidelines need widespread adoptionreview · 4 shared references 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelinesarticle · 3 shared references 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaborationarticle · 3 shared references 2004Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validationreview · 3 shared references

Details

Year2005

Typereview

Published2005-02-01

VenueNature reviews. Cancer

ISSN-L1474-175X

Languageen

Citations487

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1038/nrc1550

openalex_workW1549733517

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2005

Molecular Bias

2012Why Are Some Studies of Cardiovascular Markers Unreliable? The Role of Measurement Variability and What an Aspiring Clinician Scientist Can Do Before It Is Too Late