SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research
6 references·12 citing·49 second hop
Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research (2005)Bias as a threat to the validity of cance…Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation (2004)Rules of evidence for cancer …Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement (1996)The CONSORT StatementHow to reduce scientific irreproducibility: the 5-year reflection (2017)How to reduce scientific irre…Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility (2016)Tools and techniques for comp…Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions (2013)Reproducibility of research a…ERROR ANALYSIS AND PROPAGATION IN METABOLOMICS DATA ANALYSIS (2013)ERROR ANALYSIS AND PROPAGATIO…Why Are Some Studies of Cardiovascular Markers Unreliable? The Role of Measurement Variability and What an Aspiring Clinician Scientist Can Do Before It Is Too Late (2012)Why Are Some Studies of Cardi…Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration (2012)Reporting recommendations for…The Omnipresent Computing Menace to Information Society (2011)The Omnipresent Computing Men…Methodological Deficits in Diagnostic Research Using ‘-Omics’ Technologies: Evaluation of the QUADOMICS Tool and Quality of Recently Published Studies (2010)Methodological Deficits in Di…Molecular evidence‐based medicine (2007)Molecular evidence‐based medi…Quality of the scientific literature: All that glitters is not gold (2006)Quality of the scientific lit…Evidence-Based Assessment and Application of Prognostic Markers: The Long Way from Single Studies to Meta-Analysis (2006)Evidence-Based Assessment and…Molecular Bias (2005)Molecular BiasImproving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies (2005)STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology – Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2011)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis (2008)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Metabolomic analysis of male combat veterans with post traumatic stress disorder (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reproducibility and Research Integrity (2016)Enabling precision medicine via standard communication of HTS provenance, analysis, and results (2018)Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Publication of Tumor Marker Research Results: The Necessity for Complete and Transparent Reporting (2012)Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias (2004)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research (2015)Design of Experiments (1936)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (1989)Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review (2018)Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research (2020)EntropyHub: An open-source toolkit for entropic time series analysis (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
  • 2004Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation500 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration374 cited
  • 2016Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility169 cited
  • 2013Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions102 cited
  • 2013ERROR ANALYSIS AND PROPAGATION IN METABOLOMICS DATA ANALYSIS52 cited
  • 2010Methodological Deficits in Diagnostic Research Using ‘-Omics’ Technologies: Evaluation of the QUADOMICS Tool and Quality of Recently Published Studies35 cited
  • 2006Evidence-Based Assessment and Application of Prognostic Markers: The Long Way from Single Studies to Meta-Analysis31 cited
  • 2005Molecular Bias31 cited
  • 2012Why Are Some Studies of Cardiovascular Markers Unreliable? The Role of Measurement Variability and What an Aspiring Clinician Scientist Can Do Before It Is Too Late

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2007Molecular evidence‐based medicine21 cited
  • 2006Quality of the scientific literature: All that glitters is not gold14 cited
  • 2017How to reduce scientific irreproducibility: the 5-year reflection12 cited
  • 2011The Omnipresent Computing Menace to Information Society3 cited