Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation

4 references·8 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited

Cited by

2005Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research487 cited
2019Why Most Published Research Findings Are False463 cited
2005Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies231 cited
2011STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology – Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): An Extension of the STROBE Statement129 cited
2008QUADOMICS: An adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of ‘-omics’-based technologies97 cited
2009Overinterpretation of Clinical Applicability in Molecular Diagnostic Research65 cited
2005Molecular Bias31 cited
2007Molecular evidence‐based medicine21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work