Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they? Introduction to the special section.

Patricia G. Devine

151 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality and Social Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social and Intergroup Psychology Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Racial and Ethnic Identity Research

Abstract

This special issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cogniition addresses issues of the measurement and the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. The findings raise fundamental questions about the assumptions underlying the assessment of implicit prejudice, particularly with regard to the widely used Implicit Association Test and the assumption of extant models of prejudice and stereotyping that implicit biases are automatically and invariantly activated when perceivers come in contact with members of stigmatized groups. Several of the articles show that contextual manipulations produce reductions in implicit manifestations of prejudice and stereotyping. The articles in this issue, in challenging conventional wisdom, are thought provoking and should be generative in the field's ongoing efforts to understand the role of implicit (and explicit) processes involved in prejudice and stereotyping.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 151 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.2001On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.2001Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test.2001Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery.2001Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice.2001Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes.2001How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.2001Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root?

Cited by

2003Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice 2002Implicit and Explicit Consequences of Exposure to Violent and Misogynous Rap Music 2006Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information 2008Intercollegiate Female Coaches' Use of Verbally Aggressive Communication Toward African American Female Athletes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.