SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How international is Medical Education?
9 references·2 citing·34 second hop
How international is Medical Education? (2004)How international is Medical Education?Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process (2003)Impartial Judgment by the “Ga…Self citations and impact factors in otolaryngology journals (2002)Self citations and impact fac…Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor (2000)Self-citations in six anaesth…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? (1998)What makes a good reviewer of…US and Non-US Submissions (1998)US and Non-US SubmissionsPeer review: reform or revolution? (1997)Peer review: reform or revolu…Chauvinism (1991)ChauvinismThe effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The effects of blinding on th…Factors Associating with the Future Citation Impact of Published Articles: A Statistical Modelling Approach (2014)Factors Associating with the …Crossing National, Continental, and Linguistic Boundaries (2007)Crossing National, Continenta…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs (2011)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing (2002)Environment and Planning (2012)Journal Citation Reports (1986)Editorial: Self-citation in Publishing (2010)Classification method for detecting coercive self-citation in journals (2013)Journal Self-Citation Rates and Impact Factors in Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine: A 3-year Bibliometric Analysis (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Citation gamesmanship: testing for evidence of ego bias in peer review (2012)Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal (2016)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Measuring the social impact of research (2001)Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference (2002)Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal (2004)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)"Thank you for your critical comments and helpful suggestions": compliance and conflict in authors' replies to referees' comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers (2001)Focal randomisation: an optimal mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects (2007)The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in Medical Education (2008)Impact factors: uses and abuses (2002)Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. (2007)From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators (2016)Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews (1999)Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses (2003)We Have to Break Up (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited
  • 2003Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process199 cited
  • 2000Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor144 cited
  • 1997Peer review: reform or revolution?113 cited
  • 1998What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts?61 cited
  • 1991Chauvinism43 cited
  • 2002Self citations and impact factors in otolaryngology journals42 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Crossing National, Continental, and Linguistic Boundaries15 cited
  • 2014Factors Associating with the Future Citation Impact of Published Articles: A Statistical Modelling Approach12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work