SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Permitting jury discussions during trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform.
16 references·5 citing·41 second hop
Permitting jury discussions during trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform. (2000)Permitting jury discussions during trial:…Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. (1997)Illuminations and shadows fro…Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. (1996)Bias in judgment: Comparing i…Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Explaining the evidence: Test…Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts, and the Civil Jury (1992)Blindfolding the Jury to Verd…Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions. (1989)Instructing jurors: A field e…Are Twelve Heads Better than One? (1989)Are Twelve Heads Better than …The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)The Social Psychology of Proc…Juror decision making: The importance of evidence. (1987)Juror decision making: The im…Judging the jury (1986)Judging the juryEvidence evaluation in complex decision making. (1986)Evidence evaluation in comple…Inside the jury (1983)Inside the juryBook Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. (1982)Book Review Nisbett, R. , & R…On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts. (1979)On the requirements of proof:…Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Biased assimilation and attit…The American Jury (1971)The American JuryThe American Jury. (1967)The American Jury.The disappearing trial: how social scientists can help save the jury from extinction (2021)The disappearing trial: how s…Evidentiary, extraevidentiary, and deliberation process predictors of real jury verdicts. (2016)Evidentiary, extraevidentiary…Rational inattention and revealed preference: The data-theoretic approach to economic modeling (2013)Rational inattention and reve…"Shouldn't we consider...?": Jury discussions of forbidden topics and effects on damage awards. (2008)"Shouldn't we consider...?": …Enhancing Juror Understanding of Probabilistic DNA Evidence (2006)Enhancing Juror Understanding…The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING (1988)The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. (1988)How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences: Motives that Shape Autobiographical Narratives (1994)Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit: Projection and Stereotyping in Mental State Inference. (2004)Misinformation and Its Correction (2012)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)New directions in discourse processing . Edited by Roy O. Freedle. (Advances in discourse processes, 2.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1979. Pp. xv, 336. $23.95. (1980)Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. (1988)Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. (1994)Nature of Prejudice (1954)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. (2003)Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006)A Theory of Social Comparison Processes (1954)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Group Performance and Decision Making (2004)How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups (2006)Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making (2007)Hindsight-foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. (1974)Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. (1975)College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. (1986)Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective (2002)Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. (2016)The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals’ Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas (2022)A Relational Model of Authority in Groups (1992)FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY* (1992)CONSEQUENCES OF ABUSIVE SUPERVISION. (2000)Progress in Small Group Research (1990)PUBLIC DELIBERATION, DISCURSIVE PARTICIPATION, AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: A Review of the Empirical Literature (2004)The group polarization phenomenon. (1976)Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. (1986)Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting (1998)Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. (1981)An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein (1988)International Norm Dynamics and Political Change (1998)Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. (1973)Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1988The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice6,583 cited
  • 1979Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.4,582 cited
  • 1982Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.2,816 cited
  • 1992Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.761 cited
  • 1986Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.659 cited
  • 1971The American Jury551 cited
  • 1996Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups.491 cited
  • 1967The American Jury.467 cited
  • 1983Inside the jury440 cited
  • 1997Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations.281 cited
  • 1986Judging the jury192 cited
  • 1987Juror decision making: The importance of evidence.150 cited
  • 1989Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions.136 cited
  • 1979On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.132 cited
  • 1989Are Twelve Heads Better than One?129 cited
  • 1992

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts, and the Civil Jury
111 cited

Cited by

  • 2006Enhancing Juror Understanding of Probabilistic DNA Evidence26 cited
  • 2016Evidentiary, extraevidentiary, and deliberation process predictors of real jury verdicts.20 cited
  • 2021The disappearing trial: how social scientists can help save the jury from extinction11 cited
  • 2008"Shouldn't we consider...?": Jury discussions of forbidden topics and effects on damage awards.11 cited
  • 2013Rational inattention and revealed preference: The data-theoretic approach to economic modeling2 cited