Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability?

Gary J. Lautenschlager · Vicki L. Flaherty

193 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Survey Methodology and Nonresponse Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

Investigated the effect of computer vs. paper-and-pencil administration on 2 components of socially desirable responding (SDR), impression management (IM), and self-deception (SD). Ss' degree of anonymity was also manipulated. Independent variables were expected to affect only IM scores, with the computer anonymous condition resulting in the least amount of IM

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 193 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Two-component models of socially desirable responding.1987Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception 1986Self-Deception and Impression Management in Test Responses 1989Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses.1988The meaning of personality test scores.1973Affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing.2003Computerized Psychological Assessment 1969Automation of psychological testing.

Cited by

1992Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference?2001Using Internet/Intranet Web Pages to Collect Organizational Research Data 2008Measurement Equivalence of Paper‐and‐Pencil and Internet Organisational Surveys: A Large Scale Examination in 16 Countries 2012Complete anonymity compromises the accuracy of self-reports 2003Internet‐based Personality Testing: Equivalence of Measures and Assesses' Perceptions and Reactions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.