Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Determinants of numerical versus verbal probabilities

16 references·6 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1973On the psychology of prediction.6,201 cited
1975The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II2,554 cited
1980The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments1,184 cited
1982How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions527 cited
1986Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms.522 cited
1988Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both?334 cited
1967Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities316 cited
1985Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases300 cited
1984Decision making under uncertainty296 cited
1988Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties.252 cited
1986Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions215 cited
1989Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions.186 cited
1983Numbers are better than words163 cited
1973A case of radical probability estimation.149 cited
1983The Base Rate Fallacy Controversy139 cited
1983

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Verbal Vs. Numerical Processing of Subjective Probabilities

131 cited

Cited by

1995Yes, but it is uncertain: Direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms162 cited
2002Likelihood judgment based on previously observed outcomes: the alternative-outcomes effect in a learning paradigm18 cited
2005Contingent approaches to making likelihood judgments about polychotomous cases: the influence of task factors5 cited
2004The alternative explanation to the alternative‐outcome effect and the detection of the focal outcome effect1 cited
2009How strong is the comparison‐to‐the‐strongest heuristic?: An empirical test of the comparison‐ to‐the‐strongest heuristic in probability judgment1,20 cited
2006Which Is More Probable—"25% + 25%" or "40% + 10%"?: Effect of the Distribution of Focal Outcomes on Gut-level Perception of Certainty0 cited