Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case)

10 references·5 citing·27 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists567 cited
2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists566 cited
1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework454 cited
1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
1977Modeling Relevance123 cited
2011Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement116 cited
2001Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice107 cited
2011Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T102 cited
2006Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, by Colin G. G. Aitken and Franco Taroni: 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, 2004.91 cited
2011Extending the Confusion About Bayes45 cited

Cited by

2013Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errors25 cited
2015‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?22 cited
2016Using Bayesian networks to guide the assessment of new evidence in an appeal case18 cited
2014On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014

On modelling non-probabilistic uncertainty in the likelihood ratio approach to evidential reasoning

11 cited