SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quantitative analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification
7 references·7 citing·43 second hop
Quantitative analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2015)Quantitative analysis of the Italian Nati…The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates (2011)The skewness of science in 21…Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? (2011)Research productivity: Are hi…Research design and statistical analysis (2011)Research design and statistic…Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance (2011)Quality Versus Quantity: Asse…Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks (2007)Generalized Hirsch h-index fo…The h index and career assessment by numbers (2006)The h index and career assess…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Two Decades of Research Assessment in Italy. Addressing the Criticisms (2020)Two Decades of Research Asses…Two Decades of Experience in Research Assessment in Italy (2020)Two Decades of Experience in …On bibliometrics in academic promotions: a case study in computer science and engineering in Italy (2020)On bibliometrics in academic …Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics (2019)Predicting the results of eva…Open data to evaluate academic researchers: an experiment with the Italian Scientific Habilitation (2019)Open data to evaluate academi…Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2016)Assessing evaluation procedur…Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2016)Assessing evaluation procedur…Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance (2006)Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science (2013)Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)Age and Scientific Performance (1979)Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity (2005)The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns (2008)The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences (2012)The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry (2013)What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? (2015)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship (2010)Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data (2009)Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science (2014)ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact (2016)High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers? (2018)Power-law distributions in empirical data (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)How good is research really? (2012)Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor (2013)A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation (2018)Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature (2010)Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration (2010)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The impact of the national assessment exercises on self-citation rate and publication venue: an empirical investigation on the engineering academic sector in Italy (2018)The impact of a national research assessment on the publications of sociologists in Italy (2021)A macro study of self-citation (2003)Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? (2008)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2022)Does the venue of scientific conferences leverage their impact? A large scale study on Computer Science conferences (2022)The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)Service quality perspectives and satisfaction in private banking (2000)A short tutorial of GPower (2007)Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? (2008)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2011Research design and statistical analysis1,202 cited
  • 2007Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks433 cited
  • 2006The h index and career assessment by numbers400 cited
  • 2011The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates156 cited
  • 2011Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?106 cited
  • 2011Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance103 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Open data to evaluate academic researchers: an experiment with the Italian Scientific Habilitation26 cited
  • 2016Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification22 cited
  • 2016Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification21 cited
  • 2020On bibliometrics in academic promotions: a case study in computer science and engineering in Italy19 cited
  • 2020Two Decades of Research Assessment in Italy. Addressing the Criticisms16 cited
  • 2020Two Decades of Experience in Research Assessment in Italy13 cited
  • 2019Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited