Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluations of Tests Used for Making Selection and Promotion Decisions

16 references·11 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1968Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.6,730 cited
1990Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow3,663 cited
1984Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.2,101 cited
1989Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.1,970 cited
1998Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management1,869 cited
1992RESEARCH NOTES. DISTRIBUTIVE AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AS PREDICTORS OF SATISFACTION WITH PERSONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES.1,703 cited
1993The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective1,182 cited
1991Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.983 cited
1994The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.706 cited
1994Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system.536 cited
1993APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES489 cited
1994Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.435 cited
1981Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings.354 cited
1994THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER254 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1990Scope of Justice in the Workplace: How Survivors React to Co‐Worker Layoffs207 cited

1987Toward general principles of managerial fairness204 cited

Cited by

2016The effects of computer self-efficacy, training satisfaction and test anxiety on attitude and performance in computerized adaptive testing55 cited
2004Perceived Fairness in Personnel Selection: Determinants and Outcomes in Different Stages of the Assessment Procedure46 cited
2001Understanding the assessment center process: Where are we now?44 cited
2006Applicant Reactions to Multiple Selection Procedures for the Police Force38 cited
2001Looking at selection from a social process perspective: Towards a social process model on personnel selection38 cited
2004Social Identities and Applicant Reactions35 cited
1996Should We Write Off Graphology?35 cited
2012Applicant Reactions to Testing and Selection34 cited
2008In justice we trust: A model of the role of trust in the organization in applicant reactions to the selection process34 cited
2007Test‐Taker Reactions to the Selection Process: Effects of Outcome Favorability, Explanations, and Voice on Fairness Perceptions26 cited
2024Perceptions of assessment center exercises: Between exercises differences and interventions4 cited