SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scholar as E-Publisher
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Scholar as E-Publisher (2010)Scholar as E-PublisherThe ups and downs of peer review (2007)The ups and downs of peer rev…The E-Only Tipping Point for Journals: What's Ahead in the Print-to-Electronic Transition Zone. (2007)The E-Only Tipping Point for …Is Peer Review a Game of Chance? (2006)Is Peer Review a Game of Chan…What Do Faculty Want (2003)What Do Faculty WantMaking Reviewers Visible (2002)Making Reviewers VisiblePeers under pressure (2001)Peers under pressureJournal editing: Managing the peer review process for timely publication of articles (2000)Journal editing: Managing the…Seven years of tracking electronic publishing: the ARL Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists (1999)Seven years of tracking elect…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmask…Trends in Scientific Scholarly Journal Publishing in the United States (1997)Trends in Scientific Scholarl…The Future of Electronic Journals (1997)The Future of Electronic Jour…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Nepotism and sexism in peer-r…Women, science, and technology. (1984)Women, science, and technolog…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Evaluating the Evaluators (1981)Evaluating the EvaluatorsPublication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. (1982)Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. (1983)Mate selection: Economics and affection (1989)The psychology of human mate preferences (1989)GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FACULTY EXPERIENCES OF INTERPERSONAL CLIMATE AND PROCESSES FOR ADVANCEMENT (1998)The Sociology of Housework (2018)Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals (2008)We Have to Break Up (2009)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)The New Encyclopaedia Britannica (1991)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The American Psychological Association (1919)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders (1975)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory (2011)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors (2010)Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure (2012)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)The Influence of Peer Review on the Research Assessment Exercise (2004)Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success (2012)Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: a generational perspective (2015)Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences (2003)The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics (2007)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Designing Academic Audit: Lessons learned in Europe and Asia (2000)Are neighbourhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A review of evidence: Table 1 (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
  • 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
  • 2002Making Reviewers Visible167 cited
  • 1997Trends in Scientific Scholarly Journal Publishing in the United States94 cited
  • 1984Women, science, and technology.90 cited
  • 1981Evaluating the Evaluators90 cited
  • 2006Is Peer Review a Game of Chance?81 cited
  • 2007The E-Only Tipping Point for Journals: What's Ahead in the Print-to-Electronic Transition Zone.62 cited
  • 2001Peers under pressure43 cited
  • 1997The Future of Electronic Journals41 cited
  • 2003What Do Faculty Want31 cited
  • 1999Seven years of tracking electronic publishing: the ARL Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists30 cited
  • 2000Journal editing: Managing the peer review process for timely publication of articles

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.