Using importance performance analysis to understand and guide e‐business decision making in SMEs

Simha R. Magal · Parag Uma Kosalge · Nancy M. Levenburg

37 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Enterprise Information Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Technology Adoption and User Behaviour Multi-Criteria Decision Making Information Technology Governance and Strategy

Abstract

Purpose E‐business adoption among small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) has been limited because of resource constraints and a failure to understand the strategic value of e‐business. To facilitate decision making concerning e‐business applications and their implementation, simple, low cost tools are needed to assist in analyzing and developing effective e‐business strategies. This paper aims to evaluate the use of e‐business applications among SMEs, to test the robustness of importance‐performance (IP) analysis models and to present IP mapping as a resource/tool for decision making. Design/methodology/approach A total of 19 e‐business motivations were identified from the literature and incorporated into a self‐administered survey questionnaire. Data were collected from 439 SMEs located throughout the US. Findings Most IP studies have assumed that importance and performance are independent; however, three recent studies have argued otherwise, identifying positive, negative and v‐shaped relationships. The study finds a fourth, N‐shaped relationship between importance and performance. This is an extension of the v‐shaped relationship and appears when the full range of performance scale values is displayed. Research limitations/implications The relationship between the “importance” and “performance” variables suggests a path of travel that can help show the e‐business adoption states and the possible undulations in e‐business strategies along the path. Firms can identify their location on an IP map relative to the N‐shaped path and then identify the path to the optimum location on the map. Originality/value This paper should be useful for academic researchers and business practitioners seeking guidance in terms of which e‐business applications to adopt and implement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 2003Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model 1977Importance-Performance Analysis 1999An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses 2004Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses 1999Exploiting the virtual value chain 1992An Empirical Examination of Ownership Structure in Family and Professionally Managed Firms

Cited by

2014Which incremental innovations should we offer? Comparing importance–performance analysis with improvement-gaps analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.