Effects of active‐learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology

Roman Taraban · Cathy Box · Russell Myers · Robin Pollard · Craig W. Bowen

170 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Research in Science Teaching

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Innovative Teaching Methods Science and Education Research

Abstract

Abstract Active‐learning labs for two topics in high school biology were developed through the collaboration of high school teachers and university faculty and staff and were administered to 408 high school students in six classrooms. The content of instruction and testing was guided by State of Texas science objectives. Detailed teacher records describing daily classroom activities were used to operationalize two types of instruction: active learning, which used the labs; and traditional, which used the teaching resources ordinarily available to the teacher. Teacher records indicated that they used less independent work and fewer worksheets, and more collaborative and lab‐based activities, with active‐learning labs compared to traditional instruction. In‐class test data show that students gained significantly more content knowledge and knowledge of process skills using the labs compared to traditional instruction. Questionnaire data revealed that students perceived greater learning gains after completing the labs compared to covering the same content through traditional methods. An independent questionnaire administered to a larger sample of teachers who used the lab‐based curriculum indicated that they perceived changing their behaviors as intended by the student‐centered principles of the labs. The major implication of this study is that active‐learning–based laboratory units designed and developed collaboratively by high school teachers and university faculty, and then used by high school teachers in their classrooms, can lead to increased use of student‐centered instructional practices as well as enhanced content knowledge and process learning for students. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 960–979, 2007

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 170 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Statistics for Experimenters 1978Statistics for experimenters. An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.1976Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook 1979Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building.1996National Science Education Standards 1996National Science Education Standards 2003BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists 2000Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science

Cited by

2011Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students Prefer: Open or Guided?2011Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes 2010Enhanced Learning of Biotechnology Students by an Inquiry-Based Cellulase Laboratory.2009The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students' achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction 2009Concept map structure, gender and teaching methods: an investigation of students' science learning

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.