SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research Ethics: Ethical Issues of Data Reporting and the Quest for Authenticity
3 references·11 citing·49 second hop
Research Ethics: Ethical Issues of Data Reporting and the Quest for Authenticity (2000)Research Ethics: Ethical Issues of Data R…Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries (1999)Handling of scientific dishon…How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers (1997)How to report statistics in m…Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Misrepresentation and Respons…Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain (2024)Narrative bias (“spin”) is co…Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial (2022)Influence of the statistical …Collaborative biostatistics and epidemiology in academic medical centres: A survey to assess relationships with health researchers and ethical implications (2022)Collaborative biostatistics a…A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship (2020)A review of the literature on…Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians (2018)Researcher Requests for Inapp…Analysis of spin in the reporting of studies of topical treatments of photoaged skin (2018)Analysis of spin in the repor…Spin kills science (2015)Spin kills scienceScientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science? (2014)Scientific Misconduct: Also a…Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin” (2013)Overinterpretation and Misrep…Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership (2010)Research Ethics II: Mentoring…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science (1983)Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)The integrity of the scientific literature (1987)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology (2000)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science (2012)Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors (2012)Teaching Ethical Aptitude to Graduate Student Researchers (2013)UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS (1988)When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship Fails (1997)Research Misconduct (2003)The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences (2009)Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers (2014)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Research integrity in China: precautions when searching the Chinese literature (2016)Relationship among factors affecting research misconduct in medical sciences in Iran (2020)Beyond the traditional: Extending academic libraries’ roles in research integrity based on the causes of research misconduct (2024)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (2020)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)“The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice (2023)Human‐ and AI ‐based authorship: Principles and ethics (2023)Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct (2024)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Reliability and reproducibility of systematic reviews informing the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a pilot study (2024)Investigating the trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials in osteopathic research: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2025)The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers308 cited
  • 1987Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research144 cited
  • 1999Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries69 cited

Cited by

  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes833 cited
  • 2013Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”164 cited
  • 2018Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians54 cited
  • 2020A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship38 cited
  • 2010Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership32 cited
  • 2014Scientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science?26 cited
  • 2024Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain14 cited
  • 2018Analysis of spin in the reporting of studies of topical treatments of photoaged skin14 cited
  • 2022Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial11 cited
  • 2015Spin kills science11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2022
Collaborative biostatistics and epidemiology in academic medical centres: A survey to assess relationships with health researchers and ethical implications
5 cited