Charting the life course: Age differences and validity of beliefs about lifespan development.

Michaela Riediger · Manuel C. Voelkle · Sabine Schaefer · Ulman Lindenberger

16 citations0/0 files storedPsychology and Aging

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Aging and Gerontology Research Child and Animal Learning Development Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

This study examined how children (9 years), adolescents (13 to 15 years), younger adults (21 to 26 years), and older adults (70 to 76 years) chart age gradients of cognitive and social functioning from childhood to old age. Participants (N = 156) rated typical performance levels in different life phases for 10 aspects of cognitive and social functioning. Compared with older participants, children expected lower performance levels and higher temporal stability, particularly during adulthood and into old age, and showed lower interindividual consensus in their ratings. Individuals in all 4 age groups recognized that fluid cognitive abilities reach their developmental peak earlier in life and decline more steeply thereafter than crystallized cognitive abilities. Older adults and, to a lesser extent, children evaluated their own current functioning as being better than that of their typical age peers. Furthermore, older adults charted typical cognitive development in middle and earlier late adulthood more positively than the participants in the other 3 age groups, which possibly reflects a partial externalization of their own positive self-views and a self-enhancing bias. Comparisons with life span gradients of cognitive performance (McArdle, Ferrer-Caja, Hamagami, & Woodcock, 2002) suggest that the ratings of adolescents and younger adults were in better agreement with empirically observed average performance trajectories than the ratings of children and older adults. We conclude that beliefs about normative cognitive and social aspects of life span development emerge in late middle childhood, solidify into culturally shared scripts by mid-adolescence, and remain subject to further change into old age.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

References

2012lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling 1932A Handbook of Child Psychology 1997Manuscript Preparation 1987Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline.1974Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action 2000Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence.2009Social and Emotional Aging 1975Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action

Cited by

2017Beliefs about age-related changes in physical functioning across the adult life span and their relationship with physical activity levels of older adults 2024Goals in old age: What we want when we are old and why it matters 2022Pay One or Pay All? The Role of Incentive Schemes in Decision Making Across Adulthood 2023Too easy, too hard, or just right: Lifespan age differences and gender effects on task difficulty choices 2025Emotional experience related to daily uplifts and stressors: age-differential effects in the context of age-related gains and losses

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.