SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Dealing with Distrust and Power Dynamics: Asymmetric Relations among Stakeholders in Responsive Evaluation
16 references·2 citing·35 second hop
Dealing with Distrust and Power Dynamics: Asymmetric Relations among Stakeholders in Responsive Evaluation (2010)Dealing with Distrust and Power Dynamics:…Fourth Generation Evaluation (2014)Fourth Generation EvaluationTransformative Research and Evaluation (2008)Transformative Research and E…The Practice and Politics of Responsive Evaluation (2006)The Practice and Politics of …Evaluation, Democracy, and Social Change (2006)Evaluation, Democracy, and So…Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation (2005)Program Evaluation, Particula…Establishing Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (2005)Establishing Essential Compet…Standards-Based & Responsive Evaluation (2004)Standards-Based & Responsive …Learning by Telling (2003)Learning by TellingToward a Taxonomy of Essential Evaluator Competencies (2001)Toward a Taxonomy of Essentia…Stake's responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution (2001)Stake's responsive evaluation…Framing participatory evaluation (1998)Framing participatory evaluat…Evaluation as Advocacy (1997)Evaluation as AdvocacyEmpowerment evaluation : knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability (1996)Empowerment evaluation : know…Developmental Evaluation (1994)Developmental EvaluationFourth-Generation Evaluation (1988)Fourth-Generation EvaluationNaturalistic inquiry (1985)Naturalistic inquiryPublic engagement in responsible research and innovation (2017)Public engagement in responsi…An approach to design long-term monitoring and evaluation frameworks in multi-actor systems—A case in water management (2012)An approach to design long-te…The methodology of evaluation (1966)EQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY (1968)Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction (1969)Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp (2001)The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. (2002)Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity (2004)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Evaluator Competencies (2008)The State of the Empirical Research Literature on Stakeholder Involvement in Program Evaluation (2013)Framing the Capacity to Do and Use Evaluation (2014)Utilization-Focused Evaluation (2018)Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research (1988)Handbook of Qualitative Research. (1995)Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (1999)Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis (2011)Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process (2020)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence (2000)Evaluation Models (2001)Utilization-Focused Evaluation (2003)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)Thematic Analysis (2017)Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations (2012)Culturally Responsive Evaluation (2015)Thinking Ourselves to Liberation?: Advancing Sociopolitical Action in Critical Consciousness (2015)Transformative Mixed Methods Research (2010)The Journal of Mixed Methods Research Starts a New Decade: The Mixed Methods Research Integration Trilogy and Its Dimensions (2017)“With Constructivist Grounded Theory You Can’t Hide”: Social Justice Research and Critical Inquiry in the Public Sphere (2019)Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research (2010)Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986 (1997)Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Progress, Prospects, and Problems (1998)An Evaluation Theory Tree (2004)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1985Naturalistic inquiry45,666 cited
  • 2014Fourth Generation Evaluation7,250 cited
  • 1988Fourth-Generation Evaluation5,912 cited
  • 2008Transformative Research and Evaluation906 cited
  • 1998Framing participatory evaluation691 cited
  • 1996Empowerment evaluation : knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability551 cited
  • 2004Standards-Based & Responsive Evaluation386 cited
  • 2005Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation381 cited
  • 1994Developmental Evaluation337 cited
  • 2005Establishing Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators230 cited
  • 1997Evaluation as Advocacy158 cited
  • 2001Stake's responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution137 cited
  • 2006The Practice and Politics of Responsive Evaluation128 cited
  • 2006Evaluation, Democracy, and Social Change128 cited
  • 2003Learning by Telling121 cited
  • 2001Toward a Taxonomy of Essential Evaluator Competencies115 cited

Cited by

  • 2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

An approach to design long-term monitoring and evaluation frameworks in multi-actor systems—A case in water management
36 cited
  • 2017Public engagement in responsible research and innovation9 cited