SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Affect Reviewer Behavior?
9 references·2 citing·43 second hop
Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Affect Reviewer Behavior? (2009)Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Aff…Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution (2008)Systematic Variation in Revie…Bang for Your Buck: Rejection Rates and Impact Factors in Ecological Journals (2008)Bang for Your Buck: Rejection…Publication bias and merit in ecology (2007)Publication bias and merit in…Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)Journal of the American Socie…Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published (2005)Suggesting or Excluding Revie…REVIEW: Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice (2005)REVIEW: Questionnaires in eco…Publication and Rejection among Successful Ecologists (2004)Publication and Rejection amo…The politics of publication (2003)The politics of publicationPublication rejection among ecologists (2003)Publication rejection among e…Negotiation on the assessment of research articles with academic reviewers: application of peer-review approach of teaching (2010)Negotiation on the assessment…El proceso de “peer-review” en las Revistas Biomédicas: Cualidades de los Revisores de “Excelencia” (2010)El proceso de “peer-review” e…Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (1996)Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (2002)Research into Questionnaire Design: A Summary of the Literature (2010)How to ask sensitive questions in conservation: A review of specialized questioning techniques (2014)Comparison of techniques for eliciting views and judgements in decision‐making (2018)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Taxonomic chauvinism (2002)Peer review (2020)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Fourth Generation Evaluation (2014)Critical reflections on the journal peer review process (2024)Science and Engineering Indicators (1993)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)The importance of early academic career opportunities and gender differences in promotion rates (2013)Who are our reviewers and how do they review? The profile and work of Biological Conservation reviewers (2016)Females Are First Authors, Sole Authors, and Reviewers of Entomology Publications Significantly Less Often Than Males (2019)Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals (2009)Brazilian Publication Profiles: Where and How Brazilian authors publish (2020)Factors affecting journal submission numbers: Impact factor and peer review reputation (2020)STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES (1999)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Publication and Related Biases (2001)What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success (2006)The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology (2009)Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management (2014)Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership (2010)How to write an article: Preparing a publishable manuscript! (2012)Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor (2021)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)A possible role of social activity to explain differences in publication output among ecologists (2008)Behind the shroud: a survey of editors in ecology and evolution (2009)Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009)Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization (2015)Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology1,164 cited
  • 2003The politics of publication359 cited
  • 2005REVIEW: Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice332 cited
  • 2007Publication bias and merit in ecology102 cited
  • 2008Bang for Your Buck: Rejection Rates and Impact Factors in Ecological Journals72 cited
  • 2005Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published39 cited
  • 2004Publication and Rejection among Successful Ecologists25 cited
  • 2003Publication rejection among ecologists23 cited
  • 2008Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution17 cited

Cited by

  • 2010Negotiation on the assessment of research articles with academic reviewers: application of peer-review approach of teaching11 cited
  • 2010El proceso de “peer-review” en las Revistas Biomédicas: Cualidades de los Revisores de “Excelencia”10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work