Chat reference communication patterns and implications: applying politeness theory

Lynn Westbrook

50 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Documentation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Library Science and Information Literacy Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies Web and Library Services

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the use of formality indicators in chat reference interchanges within the context of politeness theory, with its corollaries of face‐threat and social relationship development. Design/methodology/approach This discourse analysis identifies the syntactic and content indicators and patterns of formality levels in a purposive sample of 402 chat transcripts (covering 6,572 minutes) from one academic year at a large, US, public university. Findings Syntactic formality markers include regular use of contractions, slang, sentence fragments, and non‐standard punctuation as well as limited use of acronyms and abbreviations with rare use of emoticons. Content‐based markers included apologies, self‐disclosure, and expressions of extreme need. Use patterns are related to the level of responsibility assumed by the librarian as well as the interview stages. Research limitations/implications A limited data source and potential coder bias are the two limitations of this study. The research implications point to the need for chat reference librarians to assume greater control of formality nuances in order to encourage a more effective search for the user. Practical implications The fundamentals of politeness theory, particularly in terms of formality indicators, should be incorporated into staff training and behavioral standards for reference librarians. While future research is needed to determine the most effective means of employing this theoretical construct, this study implies that a self‐reflective, culturally sensitive use of the nuances of formality can enhance the user's experience. Originality/value This study is the first to systematically examine formality indicators in the context of politeness theory. The use of two coders, a full academic year's worth of data, and a substantial sample provide great depth.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References

1987Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage 1987Politeness 2001A critique of politeness theories 1973Self-disclosure: A literature review.2005Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis 2005Conversation analysis and discourse analysis : a comparative and critical introduction 1991Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact

Cited by

2009Punctuating the home page: image as language in an online newspaper 2008Linguistic politeness and face‐work in computer‐mediated communication, Part 1: A theoretical framework 2008Linguistic politeness and face‐work in computer mediated communication, Part 2: An application of the theoretical framework 2021Politeness of Directive Speech Acts on Social Media Discourse and Its Implications for Strengthening Student Character Education in the Era of Global Education 2011On Virtual Face-Work: An Ethnography of Communication Approach to a Live Chat Reference Interaction 2012Training Millennials: a practical and theoretical approach

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.