SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
0 references·13 citing·53 second hop
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals (2001)Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical…Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process (2025)Paying reviewers and regulati…Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading (2023)Research Integrity: Where We …The Cultivation of Social Work Knowledge: Toward a More Robust System of Peer Review (2021)The Cultivation of Social Wor…Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches (2019)Academics and the Field of Ac…Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing (2018)Post-publication peer review …Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey (2018)Designs of trials assessing i…Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf’s law (2015)Quantifying the quality of pe…Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape (2012)Peer review in a rapidly evol…Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology - a response to Statzner & Resh (2010) (2011)Perspectives from early caree…Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers (2010)Student peer review decisions…Signs of epistemic disruption: transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal (2009)Signs of epistemic disruption…Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn? (2007)Impact factor statistics and …Publishing Clinical Trial Results: The Future Beckons (2006)Publishing Clinical Trial Res…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The culture of the new capitalism (2006)Scientific Publications: Moving beyond Quality and Quantity toward Influence (2013)A New “Golden Rule” for Peer Review? (2014)Are Current Research Evaluation Metrics Causing a Tragedy of the Scientific Commons and the Extinction of University-Based Fisheries Programs? (2014)Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. (1949)Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. By George Kingsley Zipf. Pp. xi, 573. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Press, 1949. (1950)The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case study (2020)Translating Great Russian Literature (2020)Applied Mathematical Sciences (2021)Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks (2000)Collaborative learning through formative peer review: pedagogy, programs and potential (2012)Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China (2022)Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates (2022)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Do declarative titles affect readers’ perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial (2016)Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Learning to review submissions to peer reviewed journals: how do they do it? (2013)Peer Review, Root Canals, and Other Amazing Life Events (2015)Dimensions of trust in scholarly communication: Problematizing peer review in the aftermath of John Bohannon's “Sting” in science (2016)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)The application of vignettes in social and nursing research (2002)Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science (2019)Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do (2021)The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts (2021)Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977)Outline of a Theory of Practice. (1980)The Logic of Practice (1990)Decolonising global health by decolonising academic publishing (2022)Tracing the Scientific Trajectory of Volunteered Cartography: The Case of OpenStreetMap (2022)Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing (2025)Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (2001)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Some economic aspects of the scholarly journal system (2011)Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment (2013)Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor (2013)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Is Social Work Research in Crisis? (2023)Ethics in the authorship and publishing of scientific articles (2010)Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool (2024)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2023Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading64 cited
  • 2015Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf’s law29 cited
  • 2012Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape24 cited
  • 2011Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology - a response to Statzner & Resh (2010)22 cited
  • 2019Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches21 cited
  • 2010Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers20 cited
  • 2009Signs of epistemic disruption: transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal20 cited
  • 2006Publishing Clinical Trial Results: The Future Beckons19 cited
  • 2018Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey17 cited
  • 2021The Cultivation of Social Work Knowledge: Toward a More Robust System of Peer Review12 cited
  • 2007Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn?12 cited
  • 2018Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing10 cited
  • 2025Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work