Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences?Anne-Wil K. Harzing2012-04-11articleScientometrics76 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and InformationPsychology Research and BibliometricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.References1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2007The Field of Management's Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?2009When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis2007Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies*2005Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications2008A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics2011Core-periphery, new clusters, or rising stars?: international scientific collaboration among ‘advanced’ countries in the era of globalizationCited by2021Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation2022The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science2015Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment2014Emperor’s New Clothes2021Using Conventional Bibliographic Databases for Social Science Research: Web of Science and Scopus are not the Only Options2020Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda2014High-Ranked Social Science Journal Articles Can Be Identified from Early Citation Information2015Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007–2012