SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment
16 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment (2015)Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing t…Inferred and Stated Attribute Non‐attendance in Food Choice Experiments (2012)Inferred and Stated Attribute…Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? (2011)Are Internet surveys an alter…Research Synthesis: AAPOR Report on Online Panels (2010)Research Synthesis: AAPOR Rep…Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment (2010)Does the number of choice set…The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity (2009)The Generalized Multinomial L…Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation (2009)Modelling attribute non-atten…Design efficiency for non‐market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why* (2008)Design efficiency for non‐mar…Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys (2008)Completion Time and Response …Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark (2007)Willingness to pay for reduce…Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods (2007)Web-based surveys as an alter…Dissecting the Random Component of Utility (2002)Dissecting the Random Compone…Stated Choice Methods (2000)Stated Choice MethodsMixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level (1998)Mixed Logit with Repeated Cho…Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation (1995)Discrete Choice under Prefere…On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities (1986)On Approximating the Statisti…Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Conditional logit analysis of…Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures? (2016)Choice certainty in Discrete …Stated choice methods analysis and applications (2000)Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2001)Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles (2009)Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice (2010)Prospective tourist preferences for sustainable tourism development in Small Island Developing States (2020)Mixed MNL models for discrete response (2000)Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis (2010)The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2010)Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future (2018)Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity (1998)Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method (1999)Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space (2005)Socio-Cultural and Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Mediterranean Mountain Agroecosystems (2014)Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments (2020)Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys (1991)Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology (1995)Web Surveys (2000)Speeding in Web Surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining (2012)Beyond the Personalization–Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization (2017)Straightlining: Overview of Measurement, Comparison of Indicators, and Effects in Mail–Web Mixed-Mode Surveys (2018)The need for cognition. (1982)Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys (2006)Comparing Data Characteristics and Results of an Online Factorial Survey between a Population-Based and a Crowdsource-Recruited Sample (2014)A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples (2016)A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? (2018)Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy (1980)Macroeconomics and Reality (1980)Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin? (2001)Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks (2004)Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application (2019)Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys (1999)Valuing Mortality-Risk Reduction: Using Visual Aids to Improve the Validity of Contingent Valuation (2001)A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches (2011)The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice (2003)Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature (2010)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Incentive and informational properties of preference questions (2007)Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior14,281 cited
  • 2000Stated Choice Methods3,818 cited
  • 1986On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities2,382 cited
  • 1998Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level2,161 cited
  • 2009The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity808 cited
  • 2008Design efficiency for non‐market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why*630 cited
  • 2010Research Synthesis: AAPOR Report on Online Panels584 cited
  • 2009Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation393 cited
  • 2008Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys334 cited
  • 1995Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation310 cited
  • 2007Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark276 cited
  • 2007Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods275 cited
  • 2010Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment264 cited
  • 2012Inferred and Stated Attribute Non‐attendance in Food Choice Experiments241 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?236 cited
  • 2002Dissecting the Random Component of Utility216 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures?66 cited