References

• 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
• 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
• 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
• 1998Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials684 cited
• 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
• 1995Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?527 cited
• 2000What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?454 cited
• 2005Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary206 cited
• 2006The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study156 cited
• 1992Bilharzia: a history of imperial tropical medicine114 cited
• 1992Bilharzia; a history of imperial tropical medicine110 cited
• 2006International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases83 cited
• 2002Searching the Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) database improves systematic reviews