Can reading accuracy and comprehension be separated in the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability?

Alice L. R. Spooner · Alan Baddeley · Susan Elizabeth Gathercole

65 citations0/0 files storedBritish Journal of Educational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reading and Literacy Development Language Development and Disorders Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA) (Neale, 1997) is widely used in education and research. It provides measures of reading accuracy (decoding) and comprehension, which are frequently interpreted separately. AIMS: Three studies were conducted to investigate the degree to which the NARA measures could be separated. SAMPLES: British 7- and 8-year-olds participated in Study 1 (N=114) and Study 2 (N=212). In Study 3, 16 skilled and less-skilled comprehenders were identified from the Study 2 sample. METHODS: Study 1: By investigating their contribution to silent reading comprehension, the independence of NARA decoding and comprehension scores was determined. Study 2: Decoding groups matched for listening comprehension were compared on the NARA comprehension measure, and population performance was compared across listening comprehension and NARA reading comprehension. Study 3: Comprehension groups were compared on ability to answer open-ended and forced-choice questions. RESULTS: Firstly, NARA comprehension performance depended on decoding, to the extent that children with high listening comprehension ability but low decoding ability attained low NARA comprehension scores. Secondly, 32% of children who attained low NARA comprehension scores exhibited high listening comprehension. Thirdly, comprehension groups differed when assessed with open-ended questions but not when assessed with forced-choice questions. CONCLUSIONS: The NARA can underestimate the comprehension ability of children with weak decoding skills and children who have some difficulty with open-ended questions. The decoding and comprehension measures of the NARA cannot be separated. These findings have important implications for the interpretation of the measures provided by the NARA, in education and research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition 1990Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.1999Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children 2001Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge 1998Semantic Processing and the Development of Word-Recognition Skills: Evidence from Children with Reading Comprehension Difficulties 1998Individual Differences in Contextual Facilitation: Evidence from Dyslexia and Poor Reading Comprehension 1999Working Memory Deficits in Poor Comprehenders Reflect Underlying Language Impairments 1997Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill

Cited by

2014The influence of learning a second language in primary school on developing first language literacy skills 2009The comprehension skills of children learning English as an additional language 2016The comprehension problems for second‐language learners with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta‐analysis 2011Translating Advances in Reading Comprehension Research to Educational Practice.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.