Avoiding Bias in Publication Bias Research: The Value of “Null” FindingsSven Kepes, George C. Banks, In‐Sue Oh2012-10-25articleJournal of Business and Psychology117 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 117 citations exist upstream.References2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Cited by2019Leaving Work at Work: A Meta-Analysis on Employee Recovery From Work2020Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis2017A meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership2013How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?2019The state of research on leader humor2014Evidence-Based Management and the Trustworthiness of Our Cumulative Scientific Knowledge: Implications for Teaching, Research, and Practice2015Cynical About Change? A Preliminary Meta-Analysis and Future Research Agenda2021Times are changing, bias isn’t: A meta-meta-analysis on publication bias detection practices, prevalence rates, and predictors in industrial/organizational psychology.