The Effect of Syntax on Readability for ESL Students in Puerto Rico

Eileen K. Blau

89 citations0/0 files storedTESOL Quarterly

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Second Language Acquisition and Learning EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Text Readability and Simplification

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of manipulating the degree of sentence combining on reading comprehension for two groups of ESL students. This approach to the effect of syntax on readability challenged the usual sentence length criterion of commonly used readability formulas which deem short sentences easy to read. Eighteen short passages were developed in three versions. Vocabulary and content were held constant while sentence structure varied. Version 1 consisted of short, simple sentences, version 2 of complex sentences with clues to underlying relationships left intact, and version 3 of complex sentences without such clues. The instrument was administered to college students. Contrary to what readability formulas imply, version 2 rather than version 1 yielded the highest comprehension scores. The same instrument was administered to a sample of eighth graders to determine if the formulas are a more accurate indicator for younger students. Results revealed that they are not. It was concluded that lower readability level material, as measured by common readability formulas, does not facilitate comprehension for these ESL students. The sentence structure typical of such material may actually impede comprehension and is thus not recommended for these students. Because the acquisition of information is so dependent on reading, the measurement of readability of materials is of great concern. The most common readability formulas, used to find the appropriate grade level of written material, consider two characteristics of printed matter: word difficulty and sentence length. Other than the sentence length criterion, these formulas pay little attention to syntax as a factor in readability, and the implication is clearly that shorter sentences are easier to comprehend. That may be true for young children learning to read in their own language, but is it true for more

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students 1979Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory 1974The Effects of Grammatical Complexity on Children's Comprehension, Recall, and Conception of Certain Semantic Relations 1978Comprehension of Connected Discourse: A Study into the Relationships between the Structure of Text and Information Recalled 1971SOME SOURCES OF READING PROBLEMS FOR FOREIGN‐LANGUAGE LEARNERS 1

Cited by

2012Second Language Listening and Unfamiliar Proper Names: Comprehension Barrier?2019The contribution of reading emotions to reading comprehension: the mediating effect of reading engagement using a structural equation modeling approach 2014Complex Text and New Common Standards in the United States: Pedagogical Implications for English Learners 1998The effects of the amount and type of simplification on foreign language reading comprehension 1988SLA and Classroom Instruction: Reading 2007Content schemata, linguistic simplification, and EFL readers’ comprehension and recall 2014The State of the Field

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.