SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria
13 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria (2014)Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, a…Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged…Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements? (2010)Quality reporting of endoscop…STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? (2009)STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE…Health Insurers and Medical-Imaging Policy — A Work in Progress (2009)Health Insurers and Medical-I…Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: No Change Since STARD Statement Publication—Before-and-after Study (2008)Quality of Reporting of Diagn…The Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies of Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma (2007)The Quality of Reporting of D…The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of diagnostic acc…The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals (2005)The quality of reporting of d…An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the ‘STARD’ checklist (2004)An evidence-based approach to…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation (2004)Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research (2005)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals? (2006)The Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Glaucoma Using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (2006)The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015 (2016)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)STARD Statement: Still Room for Improvement in the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2008)Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008)Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)Expanded Use Of Imaging Technology And The Challenge Of Measuring Value (2008)Prioritizing Comparative-Effectiveness Research — IOM Recommendations (2009)Geographic Variation in the Utilization of Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging: National Medicare Data, 1998–2007 (2010)A causal perspective on dataset bias in machine learning for medical imaging (2024)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study (2003)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery (2010)Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Risk Prediction Studies: The GRIPS Statement (2011)Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal (2016)Creation and Critique of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Use of the STARD and QUADAS Methodological Quality Assessment Tools (2007)Seroprevalence of transfusion-transmissible infections and evaluation of the pre-donation screening performance at the Provincial Hospital of Tete, Mozambique (2011)Are Study and Journal Characteristics Reliable Indicators of “Truth” in Imaging Research? (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
  • 2009Health Insurers and Medical-Imaging Policy — A Work in Progress320 cited
  • 2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
  • 2012Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals200 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.133 cited
  • 2009STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?116 cited
  • 2008Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: No Change Since STARD Statement Publication—Before-and-after Study64 cited
  • 2005The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals36 cited
  • 2010Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?27 cited
  • 2007The Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies of Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma24 cited
  • 2004An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the ‘STARD’ checklist

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.