SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Lessons from the Darsee Affair
0 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)Lessons from the Darsee AffairHonor in Science (2016)Honor in ScienceHonorary Authorship: Frequency and Associated Factors in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Articles (2013)Honorary Authorship: Frequenc…A Brief History of RCR Education (2013)A Brief History of RCR Educat…A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2008)A Review of the Types of Scie…Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? (2003)Can authorship policies help …Responsible authorship and peer review (2002)Responsible authorship and pe…Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? (1999)Confronting misconduct in sci…The Instability of Authorship: Credit and Responsibility in Contemporary Biomedicine (1998)The Instability of Authorship…A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science (1997)A proposal for a new system o…The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 1 (1996)The Ingelfinger rule, embargo…Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud (1995)Lessons from the Pearce affai…Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes (1994)Scientific Misconduct and Edi…On Authorship and Acknowledgments (1991)On Authorship and Acknowledgm…How Good is Peer Review? (1989)How Good is Peer Review?Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Misrepresentation and Respons…Authorship and Other Credits (1984)Authorship and Other CreditsThe Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the 'Author' (1984)The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England (1988)The Patent and the Malanggan (2001)Social dynamics of research collaboration: norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights (2014)15. The Death of the Author (2017)Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science (2018)Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. (1992)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” (2000)Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams (2019)A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship (2020)Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science (1983)Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)The integrity of the scientific literature (1987)Responding to Challenges in Educating for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007)Correction: Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1993)Inconsistency in Evidentiary Standards for Medical Testimony (2002)Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? (2003)THE ART OF SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION (1951)Advice To A Young Scientist (1979)What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment (2017)Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)"Hanging from the Masthead": Reflections on Authorship (1982)Coping with Fraud: The Darsee Case (1983)Abstract Creep and Author Inflation (1990)Coauthorship Trends in the Leading Radiological Journals (1993)A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades (1999)Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science (2005)Should I include studies from “predatory” journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers (2021)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1991)Authorship: “Law” and Order (1999)How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Write a Research Article? Authorship Proliferation in Neurosurgical Research (2000)Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)Betrayers of the Truth (1982)Irresponsible Authorship and Wasteful Publication (1986)Stealing into Print (1992)Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Receiving, Not Receiving, and Rejecting Credit (2010)Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications (2017)Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)The Ingelfinger Rule (1981)The Internet and theJournal (1995)Secrecy in Medical Research (1996)Medical Journals and Medical Reporting (2000)Submission to multiple journals: a method of reducing time to publication? (2005)Characteristics of Medical Research News Reported on Front Pages of Newspapers (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1987Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research144 cited
  • 1998The Instability of Authorship: Credit and Responsibility in Contemporary Biomedicine123 cited
  • 1991On Authorship and Acknowledgments99 cited
  • 1997A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science85 cited
  • 1995Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud75 cited
  • 2013A Brief History of RCR Education73 cited
  • 1996The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 171 cited
  • 2003Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies?68 cited
  • 1984Authorship and Other Credits62 cited
  • 1989How Good is Peer Review?59 cited
  • 1999Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?54 cited
  • 2002Responsible authorship and peer review53 cited
  • 1994Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes52 cited
  • 2016Honor in Science50 cited
  • 2013Honorary Authorship: Frequency and Associated Factors in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Articles

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

48 cited
  • 2008A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research42 cited