Why competitors matter for market orientation

Hans Eibe Sørensen

138 citations0/0 files storedEuropean Journal of Marketing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Marketing and Advertising Strategies Business Strategies and Innovation

Abstract

Purpose - This paper investigates whether it is meaningful to decompose market orientation into customer orientation and competitor orientation and what possible implications this decomposition may have for researchers and business practitioners. Design - Through a review of existing market orientation research, two of its salient dimensions, customer orientation and competitor orientation, are theoretically investigated. Then, two symmetric component measures are developed and tested on 308 manufacturing firms in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, supplemented with census data. Findings - Empirical evidence reveals that, while competitor orientation is positively related to a firm's market share, a customer orientation is detrimental to a firm's return on assets for firms in less competitive environments. Research implications and limitations - The study advocates moving beyond ‘global' measures of market orientation and focusing on symmetric component measures of customer orientation and competitor orientation when investigating a firm's performance differentials. The study's cross-sectional setting limits inference about causality among the constructs. Practical implications - Customer versus competitor orientation appears to be contingent on a firm's competitive environment, which indicates that market orientation and its components are not necessarily equally relevant for firms with different strategies and in different environments. Originality - The paper introduces and empirically tests two novel symmetric component measures of customer orientation and competitor orientation. Academicians are provided with insights with respect to the content and symmetry of component measures of the market orientation construct and their relation to firm performance. Furthermore, business practitioners are given a more solid foundation for better allocation of resources to their customer and competitor-oriented activities.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 138 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1988Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.1992Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit 1988On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models 1988Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence 1980Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors 2003Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing 1988The Theory of Industrial Organization

Cited by

2020Market orientation and product innovation: the mediating role of technological capability 2020Market orientation practices enhancing corporate environmental performance via knowledge creation: Does environmental management system implementation matter?2015Does market orientation pay off without brand orientation? A study of small business entrepreneurs 2015How manufacturer market orientation influences B2B customer satisfaction and retention: empirical investigation of the three market orientation components 2011

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.