SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cracking Open the Black Box of the Manuscript Review Process: A Look Inside Justice Quarterly
16 references·1 citing·51 second hopsampled
Cracking Open the Black Box of the Manuscript Review Process: A Look Inside Justice Quarterly (2012)Cracking Open the Black Box of the Manusc…Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors (2010)Quality and Peer Review of Re…A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)A Reliability-Generalization …An assessment of the relative impact of criminal justice and criminology journals (2009)An assessment of the relative…The Seven Deadly Sins of Communication Research (2008)The Seven Deadly Sins of Comm…An Assessment of Criminal Justice and Criminology Journal Prestige∗ (2006)An Assessment of Criminal Jus…Differences in assessments of relative prestige and utility of criminal justice and criminology journals (1995)Differences in assessments of…Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation (1992)Complimenting and involvement…The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The reliability of peer revie…Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees (1990)Neglected considerations in t…A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts (1990)A new approach to referees' a…Mixed Messages: Referees' Comments on the Manuscripts They Review (1989)Mixed Messages: Referees' Com…Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates (1988)Scholarly Consensus and Journ…Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than a dice roll (1988)Assessing precision in the ma…The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process (1987)The Manuscript Review and Dec…Measuring the relative impacts of criminology and criminal justice journals: A research note (1987)Measuring the relative impact…Assessing the prestige of journals in criminal justice: A research note (1982)Assessing the prestige of jou…Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors (2013)Exploring the Black Box of Jo…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (1984)Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable (1993)International Norm Dynamics and Political Change (1998)The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders (1998)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. (1971)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay (2012)Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review (2020)Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors (2023)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. (1975)Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some Basic Issues (1976)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)The Review Process at PSPB: Correlates of Interreviewer Agreement and Manuscript Acceptance (1999)A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review (2012)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2002)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2005)Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility (2006)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review (2020)Essentials of Psychological Testing (1960)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The economics of science (1996)Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Has academic criminal justice come of age? (2001)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)The Quantitative/Qualitative Divide Revisited: A Study of Published Research, Doctoral Program Curricula, and Journal Editor Perceptions (2008)A Content Analysis of Ethnographic Research Published in Top Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals from 2000 to 2009 (2010)Scaling Criminal Offending (2011)The Effect of Uncertainty on the Use of Social Influence in Organizational Decision Making (1976)Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines (1977)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Creative Development as Acquired Expertise: Theoretical Issues and an Empirical Test (2000)Methodological and Theoretical Orientation and the Long-Term Disciplinary Impact of 54 Eminent Psychologists (2000)Politeness (1987)Introduction to functional grammar . By M. A. K. Halliday London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1985. Pp. xxxv, 387. (1989)The medium is the message: politeness strategies in men's and women's voice mail messages (2002)“Was that a compliment?” Implicit compliments in English and Spanish (2012)Compliments and compliment responses in Kunming Chinese (2015)Principles of Pragmatics (2016)Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields (1978)The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences (2012)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
  • 1988Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates234 cited
  • 2010A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants232 cited
  • 1987The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process200 cited
  • 1992Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation114 cited
  • 2006An Assessment of Criminal Justice and Criminology Journal Prestige∗102 cited
  • 1988Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than a dice roll97 cited
  • 1990Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees82 cited
  • 2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors73 cited
  • 1990A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts67 cited
  • 1982Assessing the prestige of journals in criminal justice: A research note52 cited
  • 1995Differences in assessments of relative prestige and utility of criminal justice and criminology journals50 cited
  • 1987Measuring the relative impacts of criminology and criminal justice journals: A research note47 cited
  • 2009An assessment of the relative impact of criminal justice and criminology journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

46 cited
  • 1989Mixed Messages: Referees' Comments on the Manuscripts They Review41 cited
  • 2008The Seven Deadly Sins of Communication Research33 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors11 cited