SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleScientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation

Xuan Zhen Liu2013

Article2013

Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation

Xuan Zhen Liu · Hui Fang

28 citations·0/0 files stored·Scientometrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1996ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.1993Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity 1998Handbook of Creativity 2002Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships 1976A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, by Amitai Etzioni 1962A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations.1996A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains 2007Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications

Cited by

2018China’s emerging centrality in the contemporary international scientific collaboration network 2020Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies 2021Impact of COVID-19 on longitudinal ophthalmology authorship gender trends 2021Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in hospitality and tourism research 2015Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2023Author contributions and allocation of authorship credit: testing the validity of different counting methods in the field of chemical biologyarticle · 14 shared references 2019Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perceptionarticle · 12 shared references 2014A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocationarticle · 11 shared references 2013Top cited articles in adsorption research using Y-indexarticle · 10 shared references 2017Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publicationsarticle · 10 shared references 2020Contribution based author categorization to calculate author performance indexarticle · 10 shared references

Details

Year2013

Typearticle

Published2013-07-16

VenueScientometrics

ISSN-L0138-9130

Languageen

Citations28

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11192-013-1083-8

openalex_workW2016366479

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.