Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects.

Michael E. McCloskey · Deborah Kohl

181 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Categorization, perception, and language Child and Animal Learning Development

Abstract

Several recent studies in which subjects solved pencil-and-paper problems concerning the behavior of moving objects have shown that many people have incorrect beliefs about motion. The present study considers the question of whether these naive beliefs are manifested in situations where people observe and interact with moving objects. Several findings in the problem-solving literature suggest that abstract or unrealistic tasks may fail to tap knowledge and reasoning abilities that are routinely used in more concrete or realistic situations. Thus, most people may have accurate knowledge about the behavior of moving objects, knowledge that they use in their everyday interactions with objects in motion. However, this knowledge may not be activated in the context of abstract, static problems, and as a result people attempting to solve such problems may resort to naive beliefs. Three experiments examine this possibility in the context of one specific naive belief, the curvilinear impetus belief. Contrary to expectations, results suggest that the curvilinear impetus belief is used not only on pencil-and-paper problems but also in situations where people observe and interact with moving objects. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 181 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics 1961The Mechanization of the World Picture 1979Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics 2014Naive Theories of Motion 1980Curvilinear Motion in the Absence of External Forces: Naïve Beliefs About the Motion of Objects 1980Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics 1981Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects 1959The science of mechanics in the Middle Ages

Cited by

1993Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review 2006Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary 1985Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion.2008Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion 1993Intuitive physics in action and judgment: The development of knowledge about projectile motion.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.