Social maladjustment and emotional disturbance: Problems and positions II

Abstract

Three controversial issues surrounding the differentiation between the socially maladjusted (SM) and the seriously emotionally disturbed (SED) are examined. The first issue addresses the question whether treatment methods should differ for these two groups. Some have argued that the same treatment methods should be used with both groups, while others advocate that differentiated treatment is necessary if these two groups are to receive an appropriate education. The second issue focuses on whether the SM are truly handicapped. Drawing upon professional opinion, research findings, and rational analysis, it is argued that the socially maladjusted as a group are free from serious emotional disturbance. The third issue pertains to the education of the SM. It is pointed out that many provisions for the SM are already available, although perhaps overlooked. The call for a continuum of services is made.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.