Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Organizing for Continuous Innovation: On the Sustainability of Ambidextrous Organizations

16 references·16 citing·38 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2003The Theory of Economic Development22,513 cited
1995The Knowledge-Creating Company17,992 cited
1998The Knowledge-Creating Company14,621 cited
1994The Management of Innovation7,253 cited
1982Technological paradigms and technological trajectories6,692 cited
1992Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development6,453 cited
1986Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments6,124 cited
2003Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited4,379 cited
1997The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations4,284 cited
1995PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS3,777 cited
2004Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis3,734 cited
1978Patterns of Industrial Innovation3,340 cited
1992Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms2,748 cited
1995Disruptive technologies: catching the wave2,655 cited
1940Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,603 cited

1995Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry2,426 cited

Cited by

2018Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity150 cited
2020Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance126 cited
2016Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis109 cited
2010Competing through operations and supply108 cited
2015Longitudinal associations between employees’ beliefs about the quality of the change management process, affective commitment to change and psychological empowerment105 cited
2016Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: a study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms104 cited
2013Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs: the roles of internal and external rivalry101 cited
2018Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars99 cited
2017Managing the tensions between exploration and exploitation: The role of time83 cited
2018A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity83 cited
2016Entry and Technological Performance in New Technology Domains: Technological Opportunities, Technology Competition and Technological Relatedness75 cited
2019Performance implications of incremental transition and discontinuous jump between exploration and exploitation74 cited
2020How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes67 cited
2022Exploring the boundaries of business model innovation and firm performance: A meta-analysis64 cited
2019SME innovation orientation: Evidence from Norwegian exporting SMEs58 cited
2014Symmetric Assumptions in the Theory of Disruptive Innovation: Theoretical and Managerial Implications57 cited